We should continue to do this for defects for the time being.
On Sep 26, 2013 9:17 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey
>
> What did we agree to for supporting the old 2.9.x branch? I'm just
> wondering, since we're still getting tons of bugs filed against that.
> While most of them are valid in 3.0.x, we probably should be
> backporting to 2.9.
>
> Have people been doing this.  I've been doing this a bit, but I have
> to admit that I've been slipping up recently.  What are people's
> thoughts on this?
>
> Joe
>

Reply via email to