You can help! On Sep 27, 2013 2:37 AM, "Smith, Peter" <pet...@fast.au.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Back when we adopted 2.9.0 we were a bit apprehensive about early > adoption of 3.x, so were quite encouraged to read: > > "We understand and respect that there is a huge community of projects > built on PhoneGap 2.0 series and we will continue to support 2.x in a > long lived branch." > http://phonegap.com/blog/2013/06/20/coming-soon-phonegap30/ > > At the time it seemed quite clear there would be a 2.9.1, but now it is > not clear at all... > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal > Mocny > Sent: Friday, 27 September 2013 5:24 AM > To: dev; bows...@apache.org > Subject: Re: 2.9.0 Support > > Sounds less than ideal to have to backport, given that we still support > the old workflow with 3.0. > > However, I think we did discuss keeping 2.9 maintained while we iron out > 3.0 issues. I think we should drop 2.9 as soon as users run out of > *valid* reasons for not upgrading to 3.0, right? > > What do users say when you suggest moving to 3.x to get the bugfix? > > -Michal > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey > > > > What did we agree to for supporting the old 2.9.x branch? I'm just > > wondering, since we're still getting tons of bugs filed against that. > > While most of them are valid in 3.0.x, we probably should be > > backporting to 2.9. > > > > Have people been doing this. I've been doing this a bit, but I have > > to admit that I've been slipping up recently. What are people's > > thoughts on this? > > > > Joe > > > >