Don't know if this is related to the 'leaking docs' scenario, but FYI when we fetched the official 3.0 source zip download yesterday we saw there are some inconsistencies between the doc files in the cordova-docs.zip and in the plugin zips. For example, compare the media.md file in cordova-docs.zip and in cordova-plugin-media.zip. Which one is the "correct" one?
Peter. -----Original Message----- From: Marcel Kinard [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 2:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Tagging 3.1.0 today? I noticed that cordova-docs wasn't tagged or branched at the same time the platforms were branched into 3.1.x for rc1. This seems to leave open the possibility for docs from platforms/plugins master (post 3.1.0) to leak into the 3.1.0 docs. I realize that cordova-docs won't get branched because of its internal directory structure, but I'm wondering if in the future it would be wise to go ahead and do the equivalent of running "rake version[3.1.0]" at the time that the 3.1.x branch is created. Then during the rc period, docs would behave just like platforms where changes would need to be put on 2 branches [master and 3.1.x] / doc versions [edge and 3.1.x]. Thoughts? On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe the docs are now done. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4962 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4963 > > The only thing left to do is to change the pointer to use this new version. > > On Sep 30, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Marcel - one big thing that hasn't happened yet is docs.
