Okay, I've finally got time again to focus on this. I'm fine with skipping an RC announcement this time around. I'm pretty confident that the current state of 3.1 is better than 3.0 :).
Docs & upgrade guides look great! Thanks Marcel. I've just tagged 3.1.0 for JS+MobileSpec+HelloWorld. I think all that needs to happen now is for all platform owners to update their JS snapshot again and push a "3.1.0" tag. I'll work on a release announcement in the meantime for everyone to review. On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out Peter - filed CB-4965. > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Smith, Peter > <pet...@fast.au.fujitsu.com>wrote: > >> Don't know if this is related to the 'leaking docs' scenario, but FYI >> when we fetched the official 3.0 source zip download yesterday we saw >> there are some inconsistencies between the doc files in the >> cordova-docs.zip and in the plugin zips. For example, compare the >> media.md file in cordova-docs.zip and in cordova-plugin-media.zip. Which >> one is the "correct" one? >> >> Peter. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marcel Kinard [mailto:cmarc...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 2:16 PM >> To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Tagging 3.1.0 today? >> >> I noticed that cordova-docs wasn't tagged or branched at the same time >> the platforms were branched into 3.1.x for rc1. This seems to leave open >> the possibility for docs from platforms/plugins master (post 3.1.0) to >> leak into the 3.1.0 docs. I realize that cordova-docs won't get branched >> because of its internal directory structure, but I'm wondering if in the >> future it would be wise to go ahead and do the equivalent of running >> "rake version[3.1.0]" at the time that the 3.1.x branch is created. Then >> during the rc period, docs would behave just like platforms where >> changes would need to be put on 2 branches [master and 3.1.x] / doc >> versions [edge and 3.1.x]. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I believe the docs are now done. >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4962 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4963 >> > >> > The only thing left to do is to change the pointer to use this new >> version. >> > >> > On Sep 30, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Marcel - one big thing that hasn't happened yet is docs. >> >> >> >
