Thanks for pointing this out Peter - filed CB-4965.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Smith, Peter <[email protected]>wrote: > Don't know if this is related to the 'leaking docs' scenario, but FYI > when we fetched the official 3.0 source zip download yesterday we saw > there are some inconsistencies between the doc files in the > cordova-docs.zip and in the plugin zips. For example, compare the > media.md file in cordova-docs.zip and in cordova-plugin-media.zip. Which > one is the "correct" one? > > Peter. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcel Kinard [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, 1 October 2013 2:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Tagging 3.1.0 today? > > I noticed that cordova-docs wasn't tagged or branched at the same time > the platforms were branched into 3.1.x for rc1. This seems to leave open > the possibility for docs from platforms/plugins master (post 3.1.0) to > leak into the 3.1.0 docs. I realize that cordova-docs won't get branched > because of its internal directory structure, but I'm wondering if in the > future it would be wise to go ahead and do the equivalent of running > "rake version[3.1.0]" at the time that the 3.1.x branch is created. Then > during the rc period, docs would behave just like platforms where > changes would need to be put on 2 branches [master and 3.1.x] / doc > versions [edge and 3.1.x]. > > Thoughts? > > On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I believe the docs are now done. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4962 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4963 > > > > The only thing left to do is to change the pointer to use this new > version. > > > > On Sep 30, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Marcel - one big thing that hasn't happened yet is docs. > > >
