On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Being on your local head does not mean that it's on the head of 3.1.x on > the remote repo. >
The thing is that it was yesterday when I checked the commit log. > 4. Nobody's doing anything out of spite. If it means that much to you, I'm > sure people would even agree to move your commit and tag back to the 3.1.0 > branch, and rewrite the history for everyone. (Okay, I'm not *sure*, and it > sounds like a pain in the ass, but we could do it.) I honestly don't care. The bigger issue is that I don't trust the git repo and I don't trust the other committers to not mess with the git repo. Those are some pretty serious problems. We can go ahead and build this release, but at this point, I consider the git repository worthless as far as actually reflecting who did what work.
