Blog post is live. http://cordova.apache.org/blog/releases/2013/10/02/cordova-31.html
Final steps: Tweet the post (steve) Update DOAP file with .zip release (steve) Update the docs.cordova.io redirect (Michael B) Mark as released in JIRA ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/CB/versions) (steve) On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]> wrote: > Release is being uploaded as I type this email. > > Andrew, feel free to post the blog + update the site to say 3.1.0! > > Woot! > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't think Apache is breaking Git, it's just git. This has happened > > before, where I commented on the ML about a tag that had the tagged > commit > > missing from any of the branches (I believe it was from a tag from Tim, > not > > calling you out here Tim, but just for precedence purposes as a concrete > > example for this current issue). > > > > I hadn't updated my local cordova-android repo since yesterday. I see > that > > a commit by Joe Bowser with subject "Tagging 3.1.0" with > > hash 6f17e9fc9cd27f031d94d67fe118008d5f6ec5b3 - this was from the 3.1.0 > > tag. I searched using git for any local or remote branches (my last > Apache > > fetch) and it did not contain the commit. > > > > $ git branch --contains 6f17e9fc9cd27f031d94d67fe118008d5f6ec5b3 (for > local > > branches) > > $ git branch -a --contains 6f17e9fc9cd27f031d94d67fe118008d5f6ec5b3 (for > > remote branches) > > > > Thus, when someone pulled down the 3.1.x branch, it did not contain your > > commit. I assume, based on looking at the 3.1.x branch, and not seeing it > > tagged, that person then tagged it, and it appeared that your commit was > > removed. The evidence strongly suggests otherwise, imo. > > > > I have zipped up my local repo and can provide it to anyone if they want > to > > take a look. > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Sorry, was away from my computer for a while there. > > > > > > > > Joe, sounds like what happened was that you pushed the tag without > > > pushing > > > > the branch. That has happened a few times in the past by others > > > (including > > > > myself). No biggie. The ASF repos disable git push --force, so I > don't > > > > think it's even possible for tampering to happen. > > > > > > I want github back! Apache is breaking git. :( > > > > > > As far as tampering, it's totally possible for it to happen. Sadly, > > > it looks exactly like this. I apologize for getting super aggro about > > > the git screw-up. > > > > > >
