Okay I am going with the same setup as 3.0.0 with plugins/plugman not included but cli included.
OSX is out. I will look at only including 3.1.0 for docs Added Andrew as maintainer for plugman On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > Blog post is primed and ready :) > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > For docs - do we include the docs for 3.1.0 only? otherwise the zip would > > be massive. > > > > I don't feel strongly one way or the other about plugins/tools, but > here's > > some thoughts: > > Leave plugins out. Rationale: If we were to release them as zips, we > > should do so at the same time we do plugin releases. > > CLI out of the box is set up to download platforms from git, if we did > > distribute them as zips, we should re-configure it to get the platform > from > > the zip, so, no to CLI. > > Plugman might be reasonable to include, but if we're skipping on the > > plugins, might as well skip on plugman > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> I don't want to hound, but the sooner I get feedback the sooner we > >> release! > >> > >> Out > >> - OSX > >> > >> In > >> platforms > >> - Android > >> - iOS > >> - BB10 > >> - Windows Phone 7 & 8 > >> - Windows 8 > >> - FFOS > >> - Docs > >> - Cordova JS > >> - Hello World App > >> - Mobile Spec > >> > >> Not Sure > >> - Plugins > >> - CLI > >> - Plugman > >> > >> Once I upload this release, all we have left is to publish blog post and > >> announce! > >> > >> Andrew, can you take care of publishing the blog post and changing the > >> site > >> to reflect 3.1.0 instead of 3.0.0? Once that is done, email the list. I > >> can > >> announce on twitter using @apachecordova > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > Sorry, was away from my computer for a while there. > >> > > > >> > > Joe, sounds like what happened was that you pushed the tag without > >> > pushing > >> > > the branch. That has happened a few times in the past by others > >> > (including > >> > > myself). No biggie. The ASF repos disable git push --force, so I > don't > >> > > think it's even possible for tampering to happen. > >> > > >> > I want github back! Apache is breaking git. :( > >> > > >> > As far as tampering, it's totally possible for it to happen. Sadly, > >> > it looks exactly like this. I apologize for getting super aggro about > >> > the git screw-up. > >> > > >> > > > > >
