Hey Sergey,

We can still add the lines. The File plugin didn't get released with this
release. Feel free to share the line you want added about contacts with me
and I can add it to the blog post. You are always welcomed to go edit the
blog post by pulling down the site if you want to go that route instead.

-Steve


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) <
v-seg...@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Congrats and thx!
>
> I have the only following concern - since release info review process goes
> very fast (during my night) I can't participate in it :) For example for
> WP8 I would love to add one line note about important fixes in Contacts api
>  and File api. I'll figure out how we can improve this with Jesse and my US
> team.
>
> Thx!
> Sergey
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Santana [mailto:csantan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 8:44 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Plugins Release today
>
> Thanks Steve!
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Great job! Thanks indeed!
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >
> > > thx Steve!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Plugins have been released!
> > > >
> > > > http://cordova.apache.org/news/2013/12/04/plugins-release.html
> > > > https://twitter.com/apachecordova/status/408441655222476800
> > > >
> > > > device-motion and battery-status haven't been published yet due to
> > > > a
> > > error
> > > > I ran into with plugman publish. I have pinged Anis to take a look.
> > They
> > > > will be up asap.
> > > >
> > > > File also didn't get released today. It will hopefully be ready to
> > > > get released next week before 3.3.0 final!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > -Steve
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Josh Soref
> > > > <jso...@blackberry.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > I suspect we almost always want to test new feature against
> > > tip-of-tree
> > > > > > (I guess thats master).
> > > > >
> > > > > For what I believe are hysterical reasons, I think it's
> > > > > sometimes
> > > called
> > > > > "dev".
> > > > >
> > > > > > So being able to run that but replace some of the
> > > > > repos with a different branch would be awesome.
> > > > >
> > > > > > What if we used the convention of naming feature branches in
> > > > > > all
> > the
> > > > > applicable repos the same thing,
> > > > > > that way we can poke CI with a single name and it would check
> > > > > > out
> > > that
> > > > > branch on all the repos if it existed?
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > ----- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain
> > confidential
> > > > > information, privileged material (including material protected
> > > > > by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or
> > > > > constitute
> > > > non-public
> > > > > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than
> > > > > the
> > > > intended
> > > > > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission
> > > > > in
> > > error,
> > > > > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this
> > > > > information
> > from
> > > > > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction
> > > > > of
> > this
> > > > > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may
> > > > > be
> > > > unlawful.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Santana
> <csantan...@gmail.com>
>

Reply via email to