From a relative newcomer's point of view, should some distinction be
made between plugins officially maintained by Apache Cordova and those
that are not?
-Terence
On 4/30/2014 4:40 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Josh Soref <[email protected]> wrote:
Ray Camden wrote:
I had 3 hours here at the airport so I took at stab at writing content
for the Next Steps document. You can find (and edit) the document here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uJ5qXqQxK2oh1eZPgMdYuhK2rQTB7QMHXUHbkc
omWgk/edit#
Personally, I favor ether pads / pirate pads.
The main thing missing now (imo) is the Upgrade section.
I think with that added - this is in a good place (at least initially).
Thoughts, opinions, etc?
I like it.
Any volunteers ready to write out the upgrade section?
I don't want to set up a Google account at work, but
FYI - you don't need an account to edit a doc that's made "editable via
those with the link" (as this one is).
1. Please don't mention WebSQL.
2. The offline/online event is not a great indicator, it's a hint, but it
can be misleading. People need to try a connection (XHR) to their
destination, if it works, great, if it doesn't that's it. If I'm in a
captive portal, or if I'm in an office, I can easily not have access to
your backend, even though I do have some form of "network access".
3. For Debugging, on BlackBerry 10, you get web inspector out of the box.
https://developer.blackberry.com/html5/documentation/v2_0/enabling_web_insp
ector.html
https://developer.blackberry.com/html5/documentation/v2_0/debugging_using_w
eb_inspector.html
4. I think we decided to favor stack overflow over google groups
5. s/you simulator the accelerometer to test shake events/you simulate the
accelerometer to test shake events/
— this last one means you should introduce the document to WinWord and ask
it for an opinion :).
