> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Clelland [mailto:iclell...@google.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:04 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > > That's great news! >
Really! > Do you want to clone it from my repo at > https://github.com/clelland/cordova-crosswalk-engine ? I think that's the most > up-to-date repo; it's the one that I have working in all of my tests. > I am fine to work on your fork till we think it is ready for some releases (maybe 3.6.0?). What do you think? Thanks, -ningxin > Ian > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Hu, Ningxin <ningxin...@intel.com> wrote: > > > An update: the legal/license is cleared to host > > cordova-crosswalk-engine under https://github.com/crosswalk-project/. > > > > Thanks, > > -ningxin > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 8:56 AM > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > > > > > > Ian, > > > > > > I initiated the proposal to crosswalk stakeholders about hosting the > > Crosswalk > > > Cordova Engine in Crosswalk projects. The feedback is very positive. > > > I > > am now > > > going through the required legal/license clearance process. I will > > > keep > > you posted > > > about the status. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -ningxin > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf > > > > Of Ian Clelland > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:23 AM > > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > So, when Apache publishes something, it has fill the following > > criteria: > > > > > > > > > > - All source code must have their licence headers intact > > > > > - All third-party source code must be mentioned in the NOTICE > > > > > file > > > > > - No Binary Blobs - No compiled libraries, which include JARs > > > > > and shared object files (including the pak). > > > > > > > > > > Now, with Crosswalk, there's obviously the Chromium Library that > > > > > we need, so we need a way to get that into the generated project > > somehow. > > > > > The easiest way is with plugman, but the issue is that Apache > > > > > can't legally pass around binary blobs when it does an official > > > > > release of anything. Intel, OTOH, isn't restricted by > > > > > cumbersome open source foundation rules, and can do so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Intel has their own rules to follow, certainly, but we're > > > > presuming here that Intel has already worked out the legal > > > > requirements to distribute Crosswalk in the first place, so the > > > > idea of Intel also distributing the "official" Crosswalk Cordova > > > > Engine plugin just seems > > to make a > > > lot of sense. > > > > > > > > Apache distributes Cordova-Android, which defines the integration > > > > API, and includes the default AndroidWebView classes, and other > > > > parties should be free to distribute their own engine plugins, > > > > implementing that API. That distribution can then be in any form > > > > that makes sense (and complies with the licenses of the various > > > > components) > > > > > > > > Joe's right that it would be awkward, if not impossible, for > > > > Apache to distribute the Crosswalk core library. We'd have to > > > > include the 15GB of source as well, at the very least, and that > > > > doesn't sound like fun > > at all. > > > > It *is* all open-source, but there are a lot of different licenses > > > > in there, and we'd need some lawyerly help to make sure that the > > > > ASF could release software that included it all. > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Hu, Ningxin > > > > > <ningxin...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> - who publishes the plugins, intel or cordova? > > > > > > > > > > > > For this open, could someone elaborate it a little bit more? > > > > > > What does > > > > > it mean? I remembered someone mentioned the license is open in > > > > > the hangouts, any details? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -ningxin > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > > > >> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf > > > > > >> Of Michal Mocny > > > > > >> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:53 AM > > > > > >> To: dev > > > > > >> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Notes: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - native junit tests needs fixing (due to deprication) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - common script for creating walk mobilespec > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - fix failing mobile spec tests (file-transfer?, media?) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - who publishes the plugins, intel or cordova? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - static vs dynamic xwalk lib > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - (option) one plugin, use hooks to download static library > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - (option) one plugin, just bundle static lib > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - (option) one plugin, download static lib on app run > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - (option) two plugins, xwalk lib bundled in a separate > > > > > >> plugin, and > > > > > can be added > > > > > >> as a <dep>? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - intel vs arm binary apk targets for CLI. Two android > > > > > >> platforms, or > > > > > just two build > > > > > >> targets? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - How long to get GeckoView: Joe not sure. days to weeks :( > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - Not blocking, though > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - plugman works to install but CLI does not, lets figure that > > > > > >> out > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - Other platforms: Windows Phone support!? BB10?! > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - Can we share code between xwalk WebViewClient and gecko > > > > > >> view WebViewClient etc? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Josh Soref > > > > > >> <jso...@blackberry.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Ian Clelland wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://staging.talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/7ecpi3uaclcuedn > > > > > 7imn > > > > > 6b > > > > > >> > 9jdq > > > > > >> > >c > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/7ecpi3uaclcuedn7im > > > > > >> > n6b9 > > > > > >> > jd > > > > > >> > qc > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Might work. Staging is probably internal. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
