Thanks Brian. Its looking like 3:00 PM EST Tomorrow or 12:00 PM EST Thursday is the best fit -- but some contributors whose opinions I'm interested in have yet to fill out the form (looking at you Brian, Jesse, Joe).
-Michal On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > This doc is a really great summary: thank you Michal (and everyone else for > the input). Super agree with starting from positive goals Marcel. > > I've been asking around other Apache projects (Jackrabbit and Sling) and > the Gentoo Linux guys. This problem is hard. The good news is: we're not > the only ones that have run into it. The general consensus I'm getting back > is to pin the versions sort of like we used to do. So the CLI is version 4 > and then so are the platforms. This means "artificial" tagging of the repos > in scenarios where one is ready to ship and others are not. It also means > keeping MASTER green and deploy-able at all times by working from feature > branches so that a release tag is a trivial annoyance instead of a full > regression testing cycle. Versions are quite specifically for issue > tracking so keeping that as simple as possible means higher quality bug > reporting and (hopefully) resolution. > > Anyhow: look fwd to the conversation. Feels like we're making some > progress. > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 7, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > > "Do not confuse developers" goal hopefully covers your points about > > communication and information > > > > It partially covers it. > > > > To be more explicit, I'm trying to turn a negative goal into a positive > > goal. So instead of "how do we not mess this up" I'm going for "what are > we > > really trying to achieve". > > > > And I'm also trying to twist a cordova-dev goal into a cordova-user goal. > > I don't think we know what the ideal user experience is, so it is hard to > > talk about how to achieve that. > > > > >
