Nope. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, 5:04 PM Jesse <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would much rather we fix things, than continually rewrite + discard, > which seems to be the norm these days. > tape/tap would require us to throw away thousands of jasmine2 based tests > wouldn't it? > > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > > > tape (and or tap) has no globals and simple / shallow callback solution > > which fixes that > > > > we will have fresh intern blood to sacrifice to the test lib gods alter > > soon.. > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, 4:10 PM Michal Mocny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I've seen that in the past and it usually happens due to misuse of > > jasmine, > > > which seems unfortunately quite brittle. Specifically, if done() isn't > > > called, or an async event fires after a test has already failed / timed > > out > > > and calls done(), or registers new tests with it() etc, weird things > will > > > happen. > > > > > > Usually its a sign that a test is not handling failures appropriately, > > but > > > it is a bit unfortunate that jasmine is so brittle. > > > > > > -Michal > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Toda, Shingo < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This is exactly what I got too. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Shingo > > > > > > > > From: Shazron [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 9:02 AM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Cc: Toda, Shingo > > > > Subject: Re: [mobile-spec] consistency and reliability > > > > > > > > Seems to be exactly what I am seeing. > > > > Here's the image as a link: http://i.imgur.com/n6ST1Kd.png?1 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Toda, Shingo < > > > [email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi Shazron > > > > > > > > Our team are running mobilespec for Android, iOS and Windows. I > cannot > > > see > > > > the attachment but we also have been seeing what you’ve gotten since > > new > > > > style mobilespec was introduced. It seems that each plugin test run > > works > > > > fine but if all tests get run at once I am likely to get more than > one > > > > report in a run reporting that there are a number of specs like 900 > > specs > > > > (I don’t think specs are so much). > > > > > > > > I noticed that some of the specs were called more than once when I > got > > > > multiple reports. I usually disable FileTransfer, Globalization and > > Media > > > > specs at first then run test for them individually because I saw some > > of > > > > those tests got called more than once. This could be just my case so > it > > > > might not be yours. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Shingo > > > > > > > > From: Shazron [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > > > > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 7:54 AM > > > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > > Subject: [mobile-spec] consistency and reliability > > > > > > > > > > > > `cordova-mobile-spec/createmobilespec/createmobilespec.js --ios > > > > --globalplugins` > > > > > > > > Has anyone gotten mobile-spec to work consistently? I get wildly > > > different > > > > results on each run. Sometimes there is more than one report in a > run. > > > See: > > > > > > > > [Inline image 1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
