I attempted to clear my memory and revisited the page. From that POV the link title worked for me.
Following the instructions at IssueWorkflow for submitting a patch, I forked https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer , made the edit, and submitted a pull request. Per those instructions I am pasting the pull request link in an email (this email) to the mailing-list: https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/50 The instructions at IssueWorkflow say I should fork dev, not master, but the dev branch of that plugin says that it is obsolete and master should be used instead. I discovered after making the pull request that should have called out someone to review my change by picking a reviewer from the component list <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Acomponents-panel>. I should have pinged Max Woghiren <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+CB+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+assignee+%3D+max.woghiren+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide>. I made a change to the top-level index.md, but not the translations. I don't yet know how to find documentation on the procedure for keeping translations in sync. On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Josh Soref <jso...@blackberry.com> wrote: > Lucas wrote: > >My path was via http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/ContributorWorkflow. > >I read that and hit all the links except for the one labeled "Work on an > >issue”, > >which leads to http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/IssueWorkflow, which has > >the information I needed. > > Ouch. > > >I didn’t hit that “Work…” link because performing the work was implicit > >in doing a git checkout and modifying the source tree, > >which I knew how to do without hitting that link. > > Arg, you're right. > > >My error could be considered a discoverability problem in the “Work on an > >issue” list item. > > Agreed. > > > It might be rewritten as “Get to know _Issue Workflow_." > > I've updated that page. Please try to forget what you've read in this > thread and revisit the page. > If that's too hard (most people are bad at forgetting stuff), see if you > can find a friend to walk through it. > > Otherwise, we'll have to wait and see if someone else stumbles again. > > > Thanks very much. From my perspective, you've just provided a great first > contribution! > >