We'll probably need at least an RC for the whitelist plugin, if not a vote,
to be able to vote on this.

Or can we just include instructions like "Use
cordova-plugin-whitelist@f70b1bc for testing" while we start the official
release process for the plugins?

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> +1 -- Let's get this out the door :)
> I'll see what I can get done to move it in that direction.
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Everything's ready afaik (minus upgrade guide, publishing whitelist
>> plugins, and making it so that the default project template includes
>> <plugin name="cordova-plugin-whitelist" />). Maybe let's do a RC while we
>> wait on these things being finished up?
>>
>> If anyone wants to take on any of these tasks, that would be awesome.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for vote thread, let's get this thing out so people (that are not
>> > us) can test...
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > OK, this is a three month old thread, and we're waiting on a
>> discussion
>> > > before we release something? I really think we should go to a vote
>> thread
>> > > now that we have a legacy whitelist plugin and a new style whitelist
>> > > plugin.  We shouldn't keep constantly delaying this release because of
>> > > what's happening on other platforms, especially since we already
>> > pluginized
>> > > the whitelist.
>> > >
>> > > Can we please release soon?
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:20 PM Nikhil Khandelwal <
>> > nikhi...@microsoft.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I know we discussed a couple of approaches implementing the default
>> > >> whitelist policy for Android/iOS - either every app would be
>> required to
>> > >> include the whitelist plugin or have it have smart defaults in the
>> > platform
>> > >> implementation and the plugin being able to override them.
>> > >>
>> > >> I don’t think that thread closed with any conclusions.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Nikhil
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
>> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 11:23 AM
>> > >> To: dev
>> > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 4.0.0 Release
>> > >>
>> > >> OK, so right now it's just docs? How soon can we get a VOTE thread
>> > started
>> > >> for 4.0.0?
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:47 AM Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > mobilespec is now working again... Took longer than I would have
>> > >> > liked, but did you know that on Android FileReader triggers
>> > >> > shouldInterceptRequest() with Blob URLs!?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Separate thread is already happening re: whitelists, so once that's
>> > >> > figured out, it's just docs afaict.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Ian Clelland <
>> iclell...@chromium.org
>> > >
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > We should start a new whitelist plugin related thread.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Why is a plugin blocking a release?  Default (aka no-plugin)
>> > >> > > > behavior should be to allow all network requests shouldn't it?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Well, that just might be a blacklist then :)
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > >   This thread is a
>> > >> > > > month long, and not the first discussion of 4.0.0 for Android.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Seriously, though -- the whitelist discussion is much longer than
>> > >> > > that,
>> > >> > and
>> > >> > > this isn't the first time that the default no-network-access
>> policy
>> > >> > > has been brought up:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > (Here's the first question, from *July*:
>> > >> > > http://markmail.org/message/t4vj4saisem2mcgw
>> > >> > > Here's where I mentioned what the implemented policy was:
>> > >> > > http://markmail.org/message/s4necfnh4hnblpjm
>> > >> > > And in another discussion:
>> > >> > > http://markmail.org/message/ap7syhqysizmsvrz)
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > If we want to reconsider that decision, then we should certainly
>> do
>> > >> > > so before we cut a release. I think it would be a real problem to
>> > >> > > change it afterwards, so let's get it right.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Also, it's not the plugin itself that's blocking the release,
>> it's
>> > >> > > us making sure that we've implemented the core hooks correctly so
>> > >> > > that the plugin can actually do its job, and that people who
>> don't
>> > >> > > want that particular plugin can make a better one.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > (It is also an issue that a plugin, required for cordova-android
>> > >> > > 4.0.0, breaks apps which are also building for cordova-ios 3.8.0.
>> > >> > > I'll take a
>> > >> > look
>> > >> > > at that, and either remove the ios-native portions of the
>> whitelist
>> > >> > plugin,
>> > >> > > or neuter it so that it doesn't interfere with an ios app if it's
>> > >> > > not on the unplug-whitelist branch of that repo.)
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Ian
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > @purplecabbage
>> > >> > > > risingj.com
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > legacy-whitelist-plugin should be fixed so that it compiles
>> on
>> > >> > > > > cordova-ios@3.8.0. It shouldn't be a problem to fix this at
>> > >> > > > > compile
>> > >> > or
>> > >> > > > > run-time (whichever is applicable here related to the compile
>> > >> > > > > error)
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Darryl Pogue
>> > >> > > > > <dvpdin...@gmail.com>
>> > >> > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > > > > On 2 March 2015 at 13:37, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > > > > >> So, right now the whitelist changes are what's holding up
>> the
>> > >> > 4.0.0
>> > >> > > > > release
>> > >> > > > > >> now?  Is this really the only thing that's holding up this
>> > >> > release?
>> > >> > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > >> On Wed Feb 25 2015 at 1:18:26 PM Andrew Grieve <
>> > >> > > agri...@chromium.org>
>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > > > >>
>> > >> > > > > >>> I think we'll also need to finish with the whitelist
>> changes
>> > >> > > > > >>> &
>> > >> > have
>> > >> > > > > both
>> > >> > > > > >>> the legacy and new-way whitelist plugins released before
>> we
>> > >> > > > > >>> can
>> > >> > do
>> > >> > > a
>> > >> > > > > 4.0.0
>> > >> > > > > >>> release (otherwise you wouldn't be able to write an app
>> that
>> > >> > > > > >>> hits
>> > >> > > the
>> > >> > > > > >>> network)
>> > >> > > > > >>>
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Just FYI, the whitelist stuff is proving to be a bit of a
>> pain
>> > >> > point.
>> > >> > > > > > I'm using cordova-android@master, and need to install the
>> > >> > > > > > legacy-whitelist plugin in order to make network requests.
>> > >> > > > > > Once the plugin is installed, everything seems to work.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > The problem is that the legacy-whitelist plugin generates
>> > >> > > > > > compile errors with cordova-ios@3.8.0, so now I can't just
>> > run
>> > >> > > > > > `cordova build`, I need to split the platforms up and
>> > >> > > > > > install/uninstall the plugin in between. If someone makes a
>> > >> > > > > > dev build for Android and forgets the plugin, it will
>> appear
>> > >> > > > > > to build successfully but not actually function properly
>> due
>> > to
>> > >> the whitelist.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > I know, this is all pre-release, so pain is somewhat
>> expected
>> > >> > > > > > right now. I'm worried about the case where
>> > >> > > > > > cordova-android@4.0.0 is released and cordova-ios@3.8.0 is
>> > >> > > > > > still current, and how people
>> > >> > can
>> > >> > > > > > avoid whitelist breakage there.
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > ---------
>> > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
>> > >> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> > ---------
>> > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
>> > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to