Is there a place where the most popular alternative webview engines
are documented?

Should we add this?

Should I raise an issue on cordova-docs?
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:38 AM Jan Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That would be really great. Thanks!
>
> 2018-08-02 17:16 GMT+02:00 Shazron <[email protected]>:
> > We could -- I can just add a suffix or prefix...
> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:14 PM Jan Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Couldn't the class names be changed when integrating the plugin?
> >> Because the console stuff is still messing with people :/
> >>
> >> 2018-08-02 17:01 GMT+02:00 Shazron <[email protected]>:
> >> > yup, the class name conflict is unavoidable -- it's like when we
> >> > integrated the console plugin.
> >> >
> >> > The bridge plugin will be able to load any webview engine plugin that
> >> > has already been installed, not just the main 2. I didn't want to
> >> > confuse people with too much information, since this is not an Ionic
> >> > blog post.
> >> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:50 PM julio cesar sanchez
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> As long as we don't break pluggable webviews, I don't think it's needed,
> >> >> there are other wkwebview plugins (from telerik, oracle, etc).
> >> >>
> >> >> But as some (or all) of them started as forks, there will be probably
> >> >> problems with duplicate class names.
> >> >>
> >> >> 2018-08-02 16:42 GMT+02:00 Jan Piotrowski <[email protected]>:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Many Cordova users out there are probably using
> >> >> > https://github.com/ionic-team/cordova-plugin-ionic-webview. Does this
> >> >> > play any role in regards to the blog post? Should this maybe be
> >> >> > mentioned as an anticipated question?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 2018-08-02 16:31 GMT+02:00 Shazron <[email protected]>:
> >> >> > > Please review the draft of the blog post about this:
> >> >> > > "The Future of the iOS WebView in Apache Cordova"
> >> >> > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/867
> >> >> > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 2:38 PM Shazron <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> I've done with my review with all the issues that need to resolved
> >> >> > >> with the plugin before it can be baked in to the platform for a 
> >> >> > >> major
> >> >> > >> version release. I'm going to discuss issues with respect to 
> >> >> > >> migration
> >> >> > >> of developers from UIWebView (features that will be lost or are
> >> >> > >> different)
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> 1. Cookies don't persist. This is a WebKit bug, but someone has
> >> >> > >> created a plugin for a workaround. See
> >> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-12074
> >> >> > >> 2. Can't delete cookies. This is/was a WebKit bug (2015), need to 
> >> >> > >> test
> >> >> > >> for the iOS 11/12. See 
> >> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-11297
> >> >> > >> 3. Can't execute JavaScript code in the background. There are 
> >> >> > >> several
> >> >> > >> issues related to this. See
> >> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-12815
> >> >> > >> 4. XmlHttpRequests don't work, because of Cross-Origin Resource
> >> >> > >> Sharing issue (CORS). There is a workaround plugin created by 
> >> >> > >> Oracle
> >> >> > >> (UPL licensed, which is Apache-2.0 compatible). See
> >> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10143
> >> >> > >> 5. Migration of localStorage from UIWebView. There is a migration
> >> >> > >> plugin available. See 
> >> >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-11974
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> Of course there are several bugs also that need to be resolved. 
> >> >> > >> List
> >> >> > >> here: https://s.apache.org/QfsF
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> Out of the 5 issues, 3 (external) plugins are available for the
> >> >> > >> issues, 2 require minor code changes.
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> For a solution to issue 5, I am proposing a proxy webview engine
> >> >> > >> plugin that will:
> >> >> > >> 1. Read a preference to use a particular webview engine
> >> >> > >> 2. Proxy the selected webview engine's interface from its interface
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> This proxy will possibly help with migration and testing, so users 
> >> >> > >> can
> >> >> > >> "beta test" WKWebView now for existing apps (and switch back if 
> >> >> > >> there
> >> >> > >> are problems). This is like a "feature flag" that I mentioned 
> >> >> > >> before,
> >> >> > >> but at runtime, for users.
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> This proxy webview engine plugin can also possibly help with
> >> >> > >> InAppBrowser, I'm not sure (since that plugin has more hooks into a
> >> >> > >> webview's interface).
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to