On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Dean Landolt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 04:05:38PM -0800, Chris Anderson wrote: >> >> This probably isn't the place to get into it, but I've always sort of >> >> admired how the Google front page doesn't validate. >> > >> > I wonder if doing valid HTML could save them a few bytes? >> >> I haven't looked at it lately, but my impression last time was that >> they started with valid markup, and then had an iterative process >> remove random characters, keeping any versions that still "work" on >> their set of supported browsers. > > > I always thought Google's set of supported browsers was *all* browsers. >
Which is why I think it makes a good critique of validation. -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
