On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Antony Blakey <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27/01/2009, at 12:34 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: > >> Which is why I think it makes a good critique of validation. > > No way! Validation is also about accessibility, and conformance to > specifications ensures things are future-proof, and allows for independent > development.
Validation has its place. The Google homepage is perhaps the exception that proves the rule. I have no idea how it handles for accessibility, but I'll assume it the answer is good. What I like about it is the notion that leaving out " chars has a measurable effect on the planet's electricity bill. -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
