On 6 Mar 2009, at 18:50, Chris Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Chris Anderson <jch...@apache.org>
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Christopher Lenz <cml...@gmx.de>
wrote:
On 25.02.2009, at 06:16, Chris Anderson wrote:
The question raised by all of this is how closely do we want
CouchDB
to be intertwined with CouchApp?
In my opinion we should go out of our way to avoid the
impression that CouchApps are the preferred/endorsed way to use
CouchDB.
Definitely agree with you here, and I've felt this way for a while -
thanks for putting the Futon links in this perspective.
I've removed the Applications column from Futon. The index of
CouchApps could even be it's own CouchApp, so integration questions
can wait indefinitely.
I'd like to push the httpd_design_handlers stuff into trunk so it can
start to get more eyes before we tag a release. Changing the names of
_show and _list is trivial with this architecture, so I think we can
commit this change without closing that discussion.
I think it will be helpful to give the _view url change a soft
landing, so libraries and stuff can get used to it before the 0.9.0
release.
Anyway, I won't commit until we've had a little more time for
comments.
Green lights from me.
Cheers
Jan
--
