On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Christopher Lenz <cml...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Can you elaborate on what you mean with "soft landing"? Continuing to > support the old URLs for a while? How long? > heh. Sorta changed my mind on that in the last few days. My latest post to this thread is more accurate about what I think we should do: > My strategy for committing will be - commit to the branch I started > today. Notify the dev and user lists about the breaking change to view > urls. Merge the branch to trunk. I don't see much point in waiting > between the notification of the breaking change and the merge - people > who want time to convert their client libraries can hover at the > pre-merge revision until they are ready to leap to 0.9. > > Does this seem sane to you all? -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
