On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:46 AM, till <t...@php.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Noah Slater <webmas...@nslater.org> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, first round. >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artifacts so >> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >> Everyone is >> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ >> >> Happy voting, >> >> N >> > > Ubuntu 10.04: > ./configure --with-js-lib=/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.6/lib > --with-js-include=/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.6/include > make > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.6/lib > make check > > > All tests successful. > Files=34, Tests=509, 45 wallclock secs ( 0.18 usr 0.08 sys + 15.70 > cusr 2.34 csys = 18.30 CPU) > Result: PASS > > Ubuntu: > > Question - should the above be added to the readme file for Ubuntu? > Also, I'm guessing the start script needs to do this on ubuntu as > well. Should this be build in? > > CentOS: > > Also wondering if anyone had any luck building 1.0.0 on CentOS - it > fails right now because of libcurl (7.15, but 7.18 is required). Even > with the latest CentOS 5.5, there's no libcurl 7.18. Some people say > that they backport a lot of fixes though, so could we instead assume > that 7.15 on CentOS works with CouchDB? > > Is there any special reason to require libcurl 7.18 vs. 7.15? > > Till >
+1 All tests pass on Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit I've got a laptop running Ubuntu 9.10 32-bit and another box running Debian Lenny that I could test out at some point today if more testing is needed. -Russell
