secObj as well On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi all, > > I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and > validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db > (idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about > the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx). > What do you think ? > > - benoit > -- Filipe David Manana, fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
