+1 for secObj On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 18:26 +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and > validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db > (idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about > the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx). > What do you think ? > > - benoit
- request.sec or request.secObj ? Benoit Chesneau
- Re: request.sec or request.secObj ? Filipe David Manana
- Re: request.sec or request.secObj ? Robert Newson
- Re: request.sec or request.secObj ? Klaus Trainer
