+1 for secObj

On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 18:26 +0200, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and
> validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db
> (idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about
> the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx).
> What do you think ?
> 
> - benoit


Reply via email to