secObj sounds good
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Filipe David Manana <fdman...@apache.org> wrote: > secObj as well > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and >> validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db >> (idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about >> the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx). >> What do you think ? >> >> - benoit >> > > > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > fdman...@gmail.com, fdman...@apache.org > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >
