I'm pretty sure the vote can only relate to the artifact itself without modifications.
B. On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Sebastian Cohnen <sebastiancoh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > not sure about the 1.0.2 release, but wasn't at least ibrowse patched for > couchdb? building against already packaged once may break some stuff. > > On 25.11.2010, at 22:17, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > >> 2010/11/25 Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 release, round 1. >> >> Builds fine and passes all etap tests (no futon tests were performed) on >> >> * Fedora 12 for i686, x86_64, ppc and ppc64 with Erlang R13B04, >> ibrowse-2.1.0, mochiweb-1.4.1, js-1.7.0, curl-7.19 and libicu-4.2.1: >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2626994 >> >> * Fedora 14 for i686 and x86_64 with Erlang R14B, ibrowse-2.1.0, >> mochiweb-1.4.1, js-1.7.0, curl-7.21 and libicu-4.4.1: >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2627004 >> >> So my +1 here. Please, note, that according to Fedora guidelines I >> patched out all bundled libraries in couchdb. Namely - oauth, ibrowse, >> mochiweb,etap libraries were removed from tarball, and couchdb was >> built against already packaged ones. >> -- >> With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. > >
