pretty sure ibrowse and mochiweb have important tweaks, using versions without them is broken.
Not sure I understand the release process if it allows voting on things other than the release artifact. B. On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > People are free to give a +1 for any reason. :) > > However, I would be concerned that Fedora is about to ship a broken Couch. > > On 25 Nov 2010, at 22:07, Robert Newson wrote: > >> I'm pretty sure the vote can only relate to the artifact itself >> without modifications. >> >> B. >> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Sebastian Cohnen >> <sebastiancoh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> not sure about the 1.0.2 release, but wasn't at least ibrowse patched for >>> couchdb? building against already packaged once may break some stuff. >>> >>> On 25.11.2010, at 22:17, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >>> >>>> 2010/11/25 Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 release, round 1. >>>> >>>> Builds fine and passes all etap tests (no futon tests were performed) on >>>> >>>> * Fedora 12 for i686, x86_64, ppc and ppc64 with Erlang R13B04, >>>> ibrowse-2.1.0, mochiweb-1.4.1, js-1.7.0, curl-7.19 and libicu-4.2.1: >>>> >>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2626994 >>>> >>>> * Fedora 14 for i686 and x86_64 with Erlang R14B, ibrowse-2.1.0, >>>> mochiweb-1.4.1, js-1.7.0, curl-7.21 and libicu-4.4.1: >>>> >>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2627004 >>>> >>>> So my +1 here. Please, note, that according to Fedora guidelines I >>>> patched out all bundled libraries in couchdb. Namely - oauth, ibrowse, >>>> mochiweb,etap libraries were removed from tarball, and couchdb was >>>> built against already packaged ones. >>>> -- >>>> With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. >>> >>> > >
