People are free to give a +1 for any reason. :) However, I would be concerned that Fedora is about to ship a broken Couch.
On 25 Nov 2010, at 22:07, Robert Newson wrote: > I'm pretty sure the vote can only relate to the artifact itself > without modifications. > > B. > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Sebastian Cohnen > <sebastiancoh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> not sure about the 1.0.2 release, but wasn't at least ibrowse patched for >> couchdb? building against already packaged once may break some stuff. >> >> On 25.11.2010, at 22:17, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> >>> 2010/11/25 Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 release, round 1. >>> >>> Builds fine and passes all etap tests (no futon tests were performed) on >>> >>> * Fedora 12 for i686, x86_64, ppc and ppc64 with Erlang R13B04, >>> ibrowse-2.1.0, mochiweb-1.4.1, js-1.7.0, curl-7.19 and libicu-4.2.1: >>> >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2626994 >>> >>> * Fedora 14 for i686 and x86_64 with Erlang R14B, ibrowse-2.1.0, >>> mochiweb-1.4.1, js-1.7.0, curl-7.21 and libicu-4.4.1: >>> >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2627004 >>> >>> So my +1 here. Please, note, that according to Fedora guidelines I >>> patched out all bundled libraries in couchdb. Namely - oauth, ibrowse, >>> mochiweb,etap libraries were removed from tarball, and couchdb was >>> built against already packaged ones. >>> -- >>> With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. >> >>
