On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Filipe David Manana >> <fdman...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Did the multipart API GET issue caused a problem with the current >>>>> replicator??? >>>>> As far as I know, CouchDB doesn't internally use the GET multipart >>>>> APIs. The new replicator uses it however, but it's not part of any >>>>> official release. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That something I want to make sure. I have some problems to replicate >>>> this warlogs data on some other nodes. I need to check their version. >>>> There are some mixes between trunk, 1.0.1 and such around. >>> >>> I reiterate (and Adam can confirm): the current replicator does not >>> use the document GET multipart APIs (multipart/related and >>> multipart/mixed). >>> (And neither does any other component of CouchDB) >>> >>>> >> oh I trust you. I want to confirm the problem I have is due to this one. >> > ok tested on 4 machines. I can confirm that my replication pb was only > betweeb 1.1x/1.2 and 1.0.1/0.11 machines. 1.0.1 -> 1.0.2 works. 1.0.2 > -> 1.1x works now too. Will do more tests toight on different > machines. > > - benoît >
I'm so confused by this thread. Should I remake the tarballs today or not?
