+1 trillion.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski <kocol...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson <robert.new...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> 1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another >>>> known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon >>>> as we can. Can some other folks chime in with their take please? >>>> >>>> B. >>> I'm just asking for 1 or 2 days, that's not to much. >>> >>> Until there are no blocker, we can then release. I don't see any >>> reason to not do that. There have been so many fixes in 2 last week, >>> that I think it could be good to take some time to test against our >>> data. I even didn't have time to test your yesterday patch against my >>> data where it was failling. >>> >>> - benoit >> >> I'll leave it up to Paul, but the vote itself has a multi-day window, so in >> my opinion we can continue testing the new fixes during the voting. Best, >> >> Adam > > For the record I'd really like to get 1.0.2 out there and just push > any new bugs into a 1.0.3 release. If no one objects in the next > couple hours I'll remake those tarballs and start this party over > tonight. >
