On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Adam Kocoloski <kocol...@apache.org> wrote: > On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson <robert.new...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> 1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another >>> known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon >>> as we can. Can some other folks chime in with their take please? >>> >>> B. >> I'm just asking for 1 or 2 days, that's not to much. >> >> Until there are no blocker, we can then release. I don't see any >> reason to not do that. There have been so many fixes in 2 last week, >> that I think it could be good to take some time to test against our >> data. I even didn't have time to test your yesterday patch against my >> data where it was failling. >> >> - benoit > > I'll leave it up to Paul, but the vote itself has a multi-day window, so in > my opinion we can continue testing the new fixes during the voting. Best, > > Adam
For the record I'd really like to get 1.0.2 out there and just push any new bugs into a 1.0.3 release. If no one objects in the next couple hours I'll remake those tarballs and start this party over tonight.
