On Oct 21, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> `git describe` would read something like 1.1.0-N-deadbeef, where N is the
> number of commits since the last tag. On .0 releases it would probably just
> be the commit hash since the commit would not be a descendant of any tags.
> It's a neat tool but I think it might confuse more than illuminate.
It would be terribly unfortunate if there was no trackable lineage
between releases. If version 1.2 does not contain version 1.1, then what does
it contain?
--
dustin sallings
