Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part. Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks:
* Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424 * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426 * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work * I will be driving round three, obviously Let's kick some ass! On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The > performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity, > have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0. > > > On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we should, at a minimum: > > > > * Abort this round > > * Land the R15B patch > > * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy) > > * Start round three > > > > I think we should try to: > > > > * Try to land COUCHDB-1424 > > * Get clarification on the performance issues > > > > For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit. Let's > say > > a week. > > > > I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do some sprints > to > > get these issues fixed. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Proposed Action: > >> >> > >> >> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points > mentioned > >> >> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be done): > >> >> > >> >> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang R15B. A patch > is > >> >> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache CouchDB 1.2.1. > >> >> > >> >> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance regression > in > >> >> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed an improvement > in > >> >> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report any significant > >> >> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release. > >> > > >> > While I am usually cheering on the release process, taken together it > >> > seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B driver and the > >> > 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round. > >> > >> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are still ongoing > >> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Jan > >> -- > >> > >> >
