Good catch, will do in the morning. Cheers Jan --
On 02.03.2012, at 20:00, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Have you updated NEWS and CHANGES? > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part. >>> >>> Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks: >>> >>> * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424 >>> * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426 >>> * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch >> >> √ >> >> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commit;h=776aa1d0 >> >> Landed in both 1.2.x and master. Thanks to Paul Davis for coming up with >> the more canonical C version. >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> >>> * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work >>> * I will be driving round three, obviously >>> >>> Let's kick some ass! >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The >>>> performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity, >>>> have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I think we should, at a minimum: >>>>> >>>>> * Abort this round >>>>> * Land the R15B patch >>>>> * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy) >>>>> * Start round three >>>>> >>>>> I think we should try to: >>>>> >>>>> * Try to land COUCHDB-1424 >>>>> * Get clarification on the performance issues >>>>> >>>>> For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit. Let's >>>> say >>>>> a week. >>>>> >>>>> I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do some >> sprints >>>> to >>>>> get these issues fixed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Proposed Action: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points >>>> mentioned >>>>>>>> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be done): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang R15B. A patch >>>> is >>>>>>>> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache CouchDB 1.2.1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance regression >>>> in >>>>>>>> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed an improvement >>>> in >>>>>>>> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report any significant >>>>>>>> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While I am usually cheering on the release process, taken together it >>>>>>> seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B driver and the >>>>>>> 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are still ongoing >>>>>> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> >>
