On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote: > Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part. > > Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks: > > * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424 > * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426 > * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch
√ http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commit;h=776aa1d0 Landed in both 1.2.x and master. Thanks to Paul Davis for coming up with the more canonical C version. Cheers Jan -- > * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work > * I will be driving round three, obviously > > Let's kick some ass! > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The >> performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity, >> have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0. >> >> >> On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think we should, at a minimum: >>> >>> * Abort this round >>> * Land the R15B patch >>> * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy) >>> * Start round three >>> >>> I think we should try to: >>> >>> * Try to land COUCHDB-1424 >>> * Get clarification on the performance issues >>> >>> For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit. Let's >> say >>> a week. >>> >>> I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do some sprints >> to >>> get these issues fixed. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Proposed Action: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points >> mentioned >>>>>> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be done): >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang R15B. A patch >> is >>>>>> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache CouchDB 1.2.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance regression >> in >>>>>> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed an improvement >> in >>>>>> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report any significant >>>>>> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release. >>>>> >>>>> While I am usually cheering on the release process, taken together it >>>>> seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B driver and the >>>>> 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round. >>>> >>>> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are still ongoing >>>> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Jan >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>
