bump. The more I use the new website, the more I find it difficult to find the right info. Ex. was looking for jira, which i found somewhere in the text and then remembered about the "issue tracker" link at the end, but having this issue tracker link on top would be good. This isn't like it's not an important link.
I don't see any "website" section to jira, not sure if "Documentation" is about that. Maybe we could open one? - benoît On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Bob Dionne >> <dio...@dionne-associates.com> wrote: >>> agreed. Another thing we seemed to have lost on the new site is an easy way >>> to link to the API references on the WIKI. Perhaps "Documentation" could be >>> another top level category -- Bob >>> >>> >>> On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:37 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >>> >>>> The website should have a direct link to jira on top so anyone can >>>> click on it to easily report an issue. >>>> >>>> - benoît >>> >> >> Are others OK for those changes. >> >> I would add that while I like the current layout i find the website >> difficult to read. On latest firefox at least. Police is too big and >> text extend too much on the width for a pleasant read. It also lack >> some bold around for fast text focus: >> >> http://benoitc.im/vrac/f3fd34da21f150fc5e72748507001e12/Screen%20Shot%202012-04-14%20at%207.37.39%20AM.png >> >> What's the best way to solve that? >> >> - benoît > > we also lost the links to the web access to the ml, or I cat least > can't find it (markmail & the other one I can't rememeber). Is this > something wanted? > > - benoit
