On 4 Jun 2012, at 12:51, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes I will own this.
Cool. Thank you. > Last Friday I ran through the build process myself to make sure I > understand it; I have a couple hiccups in the build-couchdb bit still > which I need to sort out still. > > Some questions: > > #1 Are we linking to this on github or doing an ASF hosted one? Any > requirements either way? > > #2 We should pgp sign these. Are you able to do this or do you want me > to build/sign? We can sign a binary. I am happy to do so if somebody is needed. I would just need to make sure I was clear on the build process (which I want to be anyway). — This isn't necessary yet but I'd say it's a nice-to-have prior to 10.8 being released (I guess this Summer). > #3 Is there any substantive difference between Carlton & Hans' version now? Yes. Particularly taking about just CouchDB (rather than CouchDBX), Hans has a binary, I do not. :-) Hans' Couchbase/CouchDBX fork is much closer to the Couchbase HEAD. We should use it. > #4 what happens next? Benoit's rcouch repo has "rcouchx" which is the Mac app — this automates pulling all the Erlang/CouchDB dependencies — it would be nice to merge this with Hans' CouchDBX. After that it's: A) Keeping the CouchDB binary up to date. B) Features for CouchDBX — logging and config were mentioned. Obviously there's this list but where's the best place to coordinate discussions of B? The wiki, GitHub, a public Trello board, IRC? Regards, Carlton
