Hi Jan,

> I am on Darwin jan.local 11.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.4.0: Mon Apr  9 
> 19:32:15 PDT 2012; root:xnu-1699.26.8~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

is that Mountain Lion? I guess I need a newer XCode for that. I am on Lion 
(11.2.0 Darwin Kernel) and don't get that dyn-linking error. When I google it, 
I get only one hit - this thread :(

@Robert
Are you also on Mountain Lion?

- Hans

On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:48 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:

> 
> On Jun 6, 2012, at 16:34 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 16:21 , Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hans, this looks great thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> If nobody objects, I'll link the binary on the website directly.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hmmm not to fast... :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 1. I think we need to test it (period time). And I would love to have 
>>> feedback.
>> 
>> Good call :)
>> 
>> Some people here have posted success. I posted this on twitter and wait for 
>> feedback which I post here (none so far).
> 
> I got one, the "Verify Installation" doesn't work for me, I get a log entry 
> of:
> 
>                                                   {exit_status,133}}
> [error] [<0.315.0>] OS Process Error <0.1787.0> :: {os_process_error,
> 
> when I try to launch couchjs manually I get:
> 
> dyld: Symbol not found: __kCFURLApplicationHighResolutionModeIsMagnifiedKey
>  Referenced from: 
> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/LaunchServices.framework/Versions/A/LaunchServices
>  Expected in: /Users/jan/Downloads/CouchDB 
> Server.app/Contents/Resources/couchdbx-core/lib/CoreFoundation
> in 
> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/LaunchServices.framework/Versions/A/LaunchServices
> 
> I am on Darwin jan.local 11.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.4.0: Mon Apr  9 
> 19:32:15 PDT 2012; root:xnu-1699.26.8~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
> 
> Cheers
> Jan
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 2. We had this discussion during the summit : do we link to binaries
>>> or host binaries ?
>>> Actually what is the status of the windows one ?
>> 
>> I'd say if a committer prepares a binary, we can ship it as part of
>> the apache download infrastructure, like we do with the Windows 
>> binary now. If it is an externally provided binary we just link to
>> it.
>> 
>>> Also why not a page on the wiki that collect all unofficial binaries
>>> and the way to install on different OS ?
>> 
>> I'd say that we should have prominent binaries available as one-click
>> from the website.
>> 
>> We should totally also have a wiki page that lists all the others,
>> when they become available.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> - benoƮt
>> 
> 

Reply via email to