On Jun 6, 2012, at 20:32 , Hans J Schroeder wrote: > Hi Jan, > >> I am on Darwin jan.local 11.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.4.0: Mon Apr 9 >> 19:32:15 PDT 2012; root:xnu-1699.26.8~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 > > is that Mountain Lion? I guess I need a newer XCode for that. I am on Lion > (11.2.0 Darwin Kernel) and don't get that dyn-linking error. When I google > it, I get only one hit - this thread :(
Nope, Lion, 10.7.4. Cheers Jan -- > > @Robert > Are you also on Mountain Lion? > > - Hans > > On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:48 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On Jun 6, 2012, at 16:34 , Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 16:21 , Benoit Chesneau wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hans, this looks great thanks! >>>>> >>>>> If nobody objects, I'll link the binary on the website directly. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hmmm not to fast... :) >>>> >>>> >>>> 1. I think we need to test it (period time). And I would love to have >>>> feedback. >>> >>> Good call :) >>> >>> Some people here have posted success. I posted this on twitter and wait for >>> feedback which I post here (none so far). >> >> I got one, the "Verify Installation" doesn't work for me, I get a log entry >> of: >> >> {exit_status,133}} >> [error] [<0.315.0>] OS Process Error <0.1787.0> :: {os_process_error, >> >> when I try to launch couchjs manually I get: >> >> dyld: Symbol not found: __kCFURLApplicationHighResolutionModeIsMagnifiedKey >> Referenced from: >> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/LaunchServices.framework/Versions/A/LaunchServices >> Expected in: /Users/jan/Downloads/CouchDB >> Server.app/Contents/Resources/couchdbx-core/lib/CoreFoundation >> in >> /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/LaunchServices.framework/Versions/A/LaunchServices >> >> I am on Darwin jan.local 11.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.4.0: Mon Apr 9 >> 19:32:15 PDT 2012; root:xnu-1699.26.8~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 >> >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >> >> >> >>> >>> >>>> 2. We had this discussion during the summit : do we link to binaries >>>> or host binaries ? >>>> Actually what is the status of the windows one ? >>> >>> I'd say if a committer prepares a binary, we can ship it as part of >>> the apache download infrastructure, like we do with the Windows >>> binary now. If it is an externally provided binary we just link to >>> it. >>> >>>> Also why not a page on the wiki that collect all unofficial binaries >>>> and the way to install on different OS ? >>> >>> I'd say that we should have prominent binaries available as one-click >>> from the website. >>> >>> We should totally also have a wiki page that lists all the others, >>> when they become available. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> - benoît >>> >> >
