this thread is quite ignoring the current discussion on another thread though. The question is are we trying to hack around the problem or solve it?
I'm -0 on that for that reason. - benoît On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On 16.03.2013, at 00:47, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:16 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> You do not have to respond if you think this is a good idea. In 72 hours I >>>> will assume lazy consensus. >>> >>> Hope you don't mind if I respond anyway. >>> >>> +1
