Not trying to ignore it, Benoit. And I'm not saying I have the complete solution to all the things we talked about. I'm just yanking out one (minor) concrete suggestion and trying to get a green light for someone to play around with it.
On 16 March 2013 01:04, Benoit Chesneau <bchesn...@gmail.com> wrote: > this thread is quite ignoring the current discussion on another thread > though. The question is are we trying to hack around the problem or > solve it? > > I'm -0 on that for that reason. > > - benoît > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 > > > > On 16.03.2013, at 00:47, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Adam Kocoloski <kocol...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:16 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> You do not have to respond if you think this is a good idea. In 72 > hours I > >>>> will assume lazy consensus. > >>> > >>> Hope you don't mind if I respond anyway. > >>> > >>> +1 > -- NS
