>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >> Would there be any objections to pushing minor doc fixes & additions >> directly to master? > >No! In fact, I was doing that already even before 1.3.1 came out, I think. > >> The quicker we can get updates out into docs.couchdb.org, the better. >> >> To be clear, I'm not suggesting that major changes like Alex's branch should >> just go straight in. > >We talked about this in IRC today, but I'll reiterate here for those >who missed that: I think Alex's work on the docs branch is awesome, >but I feel like the branch has dragged on for way too long. This means >uncounted users have gotten worse documentation than they could have >gotten, because we were still tweaking some little thing or not quite >satisfied with the language somewhere. While this kind of thing can be >unavoidable with code, where there's much more complexity to deal >with, documentation isn't like that, and we shouldn't treat it like >that. Documentation patches should go straight to master or on very >short-lived feature branches. > >Cheers, > >Dirkjan >
+1 to that. Dirkjan's right, and it's past time for the superb work Alex has put in to make the light of day :-) SHIP ALL THE DOCS!
