+1. Docs with minor issues trumps bad docs.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Garren Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 I agree, SHIP ALL THE DOCS!!!! > > > On 25 Sep 2013, at 11:46 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > >>> Would there be any objections to pushing minor doc fixes & additions > directly to master? > >> > >> No! In fact, I was doing that already even before 1.3.1 came out, I > think. > >> > >>> The quicker we can get updates out into docs.couchdb.org, the better. > >>> > >>> To be clear, I'm not suggesting that major changes like Alex's branch > should just go straight in. > >> > >> We talked about this in IRC today, but I'll reiterate here for those > >> who missed that: I think Alex's work on the docs branch is awesome, > >> but I feel like the branch has dragged on for way too long. This means > >> uncounted users have gotten worse documentation than they could have > >> gotten, because we were still tweaking some little thing or not quite > >> satisfied with the language somewhere. While this kind of thing can be > >> unavoidable with code, where there's much more complexity to deal > >> with, documentation isn't like that, and we shouldn't treat it like > >> that. Documentation patches should go straight to master or on very > >> short-lived feature branches. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Dirkjan > >> > > > > +1 to that. Dirkjan's right, and it's past time for the superb work Alex > has put in to make the light of day :-) > > > > SHIP ALL THE DOCS! > > > > > > -- Octavian Damiean GitHub: https://github.com/mainerror
