On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org>wrote:
> "Recent commits in the bigcouch branch redoing some > work already done in rcouch (coming from a 2 years experience" > > Work done in rcouch is not sacred, does not necessarily go into couchdb > master without editing or review by anyone else, and that applies to > bigcouch as well. As you should know, bigcouch also builds with rebar but > *differently*. I am expending time and effort to find a way to make it all > work together. Please stop this attitude. > Sorry? Where do you see I am saying it's sacred. All I am saying is that it would be a lot more productive time for both if instead of putting code from each other branches without consultations, we could sit around a branch and start to put the code where we have the experience in. And don't get me wrong here, I don't imply you don't know what you do. But I put a lot of time, working on this code with others in rcouch, during 2 years, so it is a lot easier for me to go on it. I don't see the point at all to start a new thing on a branch which wasn't planned at the beginning of the merge. This is why I didn't included any optimizations from rcouch and bigger changes in couch core so it can be merged easily. I was hoping from more cooperation and feedback, like commenting on the code or saying if a particular piece is wrong and alike.
