> On Feb 27, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Michael Fair <mich...@daclubhouse.net> wrote: > >> >> >>> This might be what is already planned (it hasn't sounded like it to me >>> though). >>> And I definitely think changing the perspective to make "databases" a >>> function of the access control system and to make views based on "access >>> controlled collection results" instead of "databases" would be quite >>> powerful... >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mike >> >> Hi Mike, what you’ve described here is very very similar to what Jan is >> building. >> >> Adam >> >> > I read back through the links that Jan posted again; the details I was > looking for are probably somewhere in the sharding conversation that my > eyes glazed over on or somewhere in the notes of the roadmap discussion > which made it a bit hard for me to find just the parts related to this (I > most likely scrolled through it). ;-) > > Thanks for clarifying for me, and for letting me chime in! > > Mike
Those details are really hard to find — I can only find them because I know exactly where to look in the minutes of a meeting that I attended well over a year ago :) Probably a good case for an RFC so we have a current pointer to the plan. Adam
