Some of our internal teams reported that the cluster seedlist function is broken in RC1. I was able to reproduce and filed https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2559 to track.
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 01:23, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2020-02-14 5:49 p.m., Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, at 20:13, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > >>> Please cast your votes now. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> - FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64 > >> - SM185 & SM60 > >> - OTP 22.2.6 > > > > also a very excited double-plus-one for ... drumroll ... > > > > FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT aarch64 / armv8 <---- awoooo > > - SM60 with very latest patches 60.9.0_1 > > - OTP 21.3.8.11 > > > > Finished in 58.4 seconds > > 301 tests, 0 failures, 24 excluded > > > > Randomized with seed 566866 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0' > > root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # uname -a > > FreeBSD a01 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #0 r357847: Thu Feb 13 > 04:15:31 UTC 2020 > r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC > arm64 > > root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # > > > > I've left both of these running in a loop, but so far I've had over an > hour without any issue. Very very excited. > > Thanks Dave, that confirms my suspicions, that the packages in CentOS > and Debian are just a bit too far behind the tip of 60esr. If you can > isolate the problem to a very specific patch, we can both push that > patch to the Linux distros as well as update our release notes / build > guidance. With new distro packages we could even rebuild our releases to > use those builds. That is, if you have the time ;) > > -Joan >
