Do these fail consistently or do they pass after a few tries?
We are constantly improving the tests, but on occasion, we have some false
failures in there.
Best
Jan
—
> On 14. Feb 2020, at 17:00, Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> * Mac OS X 10.15.3 (Catalina)
> * Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.6.2]
>
> * All sigs are ok
> * configure ok
> * make check:
>
> ERROR: One or more eunit tests failed.
> ERROR: eunit failed while processing
> /private/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0/src/chttpd: rebar_abort
> make[1]: *** [eunit] Error 1
> make: *** [check] Error 2
>
> Not sure what the difference is between eunit and check. What I found is this:
>
> module 'chttpd_view_test'
> chttpd view tests
> chttpd_view_test:75: should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys...*failed*
> in function
> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys/1-fun-2-'/1
> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 77)
> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
> output:<<"">>
>
> chttpd_view_test:91:
> should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip...*failed*
> in function
> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip/1-fun-4-'/1
> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 93)
> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
> output:<<"">>
>
> chttpd_view_test:108:
> should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries...*failed*
> in function
> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries/1-fun-5-'/1
> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 110)
> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
> output:<<"">>
>
> Is this critical
>
>
>
>
>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 15:45, Andy Wenk <andr...@family-wenk.de> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:27, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:22, Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem:
>>>>
>>>> sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256
>>>> sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly
>>>> formatted SHA256 checksum lines found
>>>>
>>>
>>> if you edit the checksum file and add the filename, the --check option
>>> works, or you run without --check and compare the hashes manually.
>>>
>>> For the release I suggest we fix the checksum files of course :)
>>
>> ah see … I wrote a script for the process and I just pasted
>> apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 in it … with using the whole filename and not
>> using —check it is fixed.
>>
>> Thanks Jan!
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Jan
>>> —
>>>
>>>> I installed coreutils vi brew
>>>>
>>>> Andy ideo on this?
>>>>
>>>> All the best
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>> --
>>>> Andy Wenk
>>>> Hamburg
>>>>
>>>> GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 10000)
>>>>>
>>>>> Checksums and sig match
>>>>> make check passes cleanly
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be
>>>>>>> nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as
>>>>>>> well. If we need to stop the release, we will.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have checked all signatures to be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As
>>>>>>> Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one
>>>>>>> day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24
>>>>>>> hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org
>>>>>>> - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going
>>>>>>> - Push binary packages to bintray.org
>>>>>>> - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR
>>>>>>> - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website
>>>>>>> - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.)
>>>>>>> - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> None.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> Checked on Mac OS Mojave.
>>>>>>>>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Candidate release notes:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>>>>>>>>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>>>>>>>>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig
>>>>>>>>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on
>>>>>>>>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be
>>>>>>>>> made.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512
>>>>>>>>> checksums.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please follow the test procedure here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
>>>>>>>>> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB:
>>>>>> https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
