> On 14. Feb 2020, at 17:30, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Do these fail consistently or do they pass after a few tries?
I startetd the tests various times and there are always the same tests failing.
So it’s constant yes.
All the best
Andy
>
> We are constantly improving the tests, but on occasion, we have some false
> failures in there.
>
> Best
> Jan
> —
>
>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 17:00, Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> * Mac OS X 10.15.3 (Catalina)
>> * Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.6.2]
>>
>> * All sigs are ok
>> * configure ok
>> * make check:
>>
>> ERROR: One or more eunit tests failed.
>> ERROR: eunit failed while processing
>> /private/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0/src/chttpd: rebar_abort
>> make[1]: *** [eunit] Error 1
>> make: *** [check] Error 2
>>
>> Not sure what the difference is between eunit and check. What I found is
>> this:
>>
>> module 'chttpd_view_test'
>> chttpd view tests
>> chttpd_view_test:75: should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys...*failed*
>> in function
>> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys/1-fun-2-'/1
>> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 77)
>> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
>> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
>> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
>> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
>> output:<<"">>
>>
>> chttpd_view_test:91:
>> should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip...*failed*
>> in function
>> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip/1-fun-4-'/1
>> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 93)
>> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
>> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
>> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
>> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
>> output:<<"">>
>>
>> chttpd_view_test:108:
>> should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries...*failed*
>> in function
>> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries/1-fun-5-'/1
>> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 110)
>> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
>> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
>> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
>> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
>> output:<<"">>
>>
>> Is this critical
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 15:45, Andy Wenk <andr...@family-wenk.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:27, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:22, Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem:
>>>>>
>>>>> sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256
>>>>> sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly
>>>>> formatted SHA256 checksum lines found
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> if you edit the checksum file and add the filename, the --check option
>>>> works, or you run without --check and compare the hashes manually.
>>>>
>>>> For the release I suggest we fix the checksum files of course :)
>>>
>>> ah see … I wrote a script for the process and I just pasted
>>> apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 in it … with using the whole filename and
>>> not using —check it is fixed.
>>>
>>> Thanks Jan!
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Jan
>>>> —
>>>>
>>>>> I installed coreutils vi brew
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy ideo on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andy Wenk
>>>>> Hamburg
>>>>>
>>>>> GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 10000)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Checksums and sig match
>>>>>> make check passes cleanly
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be
>>>>>>>> nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as
>>>>>>>> well. If we need to stop the release, we will.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have checked all signatures to be fine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As
>>>>>>>> Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one
>>>>>>>> day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24
>>>>>>>> hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>> - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going
>>>>>>>> - Push binary packages to bintray.org
>>>>>>>> - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR
>>>>>>>> - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website
>>>>>>>> - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.)
>>>>>>>> - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>> Checked on Mac OS Mojave.
>>>>>>>>>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Candidate release notes:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>>>>>>>>>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>>>>>>>>>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig
>>>>>>>>>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on
>>>>>>>>>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be
>>>>>>>>>> made.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512
>>>>>>>>>> checksums.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please follow the test procedure here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
>>>>>>>>>> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB:
>>>>>>> https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
>
