Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check out 3.1.1 from SVN. If you checked it out from SVN, did you check it out from trunk, or from the tag for 3.1.1.
-- James -----Original Message----- From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5...@rit.edu] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014 Hello, I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my customizations to the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast. Is there any way to update the whole ctakes project to 3.2 without my customizations getting removed? It would be a great help. Thank you, Harpreet On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5...@g.rit.edu> wrote: > Thank you so much for your help. > > Harpreet. > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean < > sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: > >> Hi Harpreet, >> >> If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast >> module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup. That module has >> a new dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different methods >> for lookup and matching. In time trials it has been faster than the >> default module (hence the name). Accuracy depends upon the parameter >> settings, but in the tests performed so far the results are comparable or >> better. The new dictionary is much leaner than the current default >> dictionary, small enough to port from the hsql cached version to a hsql >> in-memory version. Using the in-memory version makes dictionary lookup >> practically instantaneous (hundredths of a second). Limited documentation >> is available in the module's doc/ directory. >> >> I will be on vacation for a week, but please don't hesitate to write if >> you have any questions. >> >> Sean >> ________________________________________ >> From: Harpreet Khanduja [hsk5...@rit.edu] >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:07 PM >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org >> Subject: Lucene for UMLS2014 >> >> Hello, >> I would be grateful if someone could help. >> >> I created a lucene index for umls2014 but only for snomed vocabulary. >> I did this because I thought this would reduce the dictionary look up >> time. >> But it still almost the same. Is there any other way to improve the >> dictionary look up time? >> >> Thank you, >> Harpreet >> > >
