I will try to do the same. Thank you,
Harpreet On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Masanz, James J. <masanz.ja...@mayo.edu> wrote: > > I'm not an svn guru, but you can use Team->Update to get the latest of all > the things you have not customized, plus SVN will tell you of the > conflicts, and you can merge your customizations into the latest. I've done > it when I haven't had many customizations to preserve. > > To get the new dictionary lookup (sub)project, you might have to do > something to get it imported, such as going into the SVN repository > exploring view and use Check out as Maven Project menu option on that > (sub)project. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5...@rit.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:32 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014 > > Hello, > > I checked out 3.1.1 from trunk SVN. > > Thank you > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Masanz, James J. <masanz.ja...@mayo.edu> > wrote: > > > Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check out > > 3.1.1 from SVN. > > If you checked it out from SVN, did you check it out from trunk, or from > > the tag for 3.1.1. > > > > -- James > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5...@rit.edu] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM > > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014 > > > > Hello, > > I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my customizations > to > > the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use > > ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast. > > Is there any way to update the whole ctakes project to 3.2 without my > > customizations getting removed? > > > > It would be a great help. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Harpreet > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5...@g.rit.edu> > > wrote: > > > > > Thank you so much for your help. > > > > > > Harpreet. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean < > > > sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Harpreet, > > >> > > >> If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast > > >> module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup. That module > > has > > >> a new dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different > > methods > > >> for lookup and matching. In time trials it has been faster than the > > >> default module (hence the name). Accuracy depends upon the parameter > > >> settings, but in the tests performed so far the results are comparable > > or > > >> better. The new dictionary is much leaner than the current default > > >> dictionary, small enough to port from the hsql cached version to a > hsql > > >> in-memory version. Using the in-memory version makes dictionary > lookup > > >> practically instantaneous (hundredths of a second). Limited > > documentation > > >> is available in the module's doc/ directory. > > >> > > >> I will be on vacation for a week, but please don't hesitate to write > if > > >> you have any questions. > > >> > > >> Sean > > >> ________________________________________ > > >> From: Harpreet Khanduja [hsk5...@rit.edu] > > >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:07 PM > > >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > > >> Subject: Lucene for UMLS2014 > > >> > > >> Hello, > > >> I would be grateful if someone could help. > > >> > > >> I created a lucene index for umls2014 but only for snomed > > vocabulary. > > >> I did this because I thought this would reduce the dictionary look > > up > > >> time. > > >> But it still almost the same. Is there any other way to improve > the > > >> dictionary look up time? > > >> > > >> Thank you, > > >> Harpreet > > >> > > > > > > > > >
