Christian, I would take a look at the IBM document attached here: http://www.nabble.com/SOAP-JMS-binding-tool-changes-td19073747.html and the specification it links to: http://www.w3.org/Submission/SOAPJMS/
I'm unsure of the relation to these documents to what you're proposing, nor am I necessarily recommending we do what they do, but I'm mentioning this in case there is something important in these documents that you might have overlooked in your suggestions. Glen Christian Schneider wrote: > > Hi, > > after Glen´s Mail about my tutorial for setting up JMS for CXF with > Apache Camel on the dev list there was a discussion about improvements > for the JMS config for CXF. > I have written a proposal how I think this could be done. My focus is > only on the configuration syntax not the implementation but I think it > can be done. > Here is the link to the proposal. I would be very interested in your > opinions about this style of configuration: > > http://www.liquid-reality.de/display/liquid/2008/08/30/Proposal+for+a+new+JMS+Transport+configuration+for+CXF > > Best regards > > Christian > > -- > > Christian Schneider > --- > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Proposal-for-a-new-JMS-configuration-for-CXF-tp19234299p19238914.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
